WICHITA, Kan. - Last week, the Senate approved their version of health care reform, quite different from the House version. Among progressives, a cry is going out: either include public option or kill the bill. A public option, it is reasoned, is the only way to control costs, and since both bills include a mandate, not including a public option forces the American people to buy into an industry that has proven itself as little more than a money-making machine allowing access to little in the way of true health care. But many Democrats are pushing back: at least it's reform, and we can change it later if we need to. Health care reform died under the Nixon Administration because Ted Kennedy would not accept the public option compromise and fought only for single-payer. When reform was brought up again under the Clinton Administration, it died a painful death. We need something, the argument goes. Both arguments are completely valid, and both are still quite short-sighted.
Front Page » Writers » Bio: Carolyn Fugit » Archives » Dec 2009
Want to read more pieces written by Carolyn Fugit?
This page is an archive of stories written by Carolyn Fugit in December 2009.
This author's preceding monthly archive is Carolyn Fugit: November 2009.
The next monthly archive, after this one, is Carolyn Fugit: January 2010.
To see all entries ever written by Carolyn Fugit, see the complete archives
for Carolyn Fugit.
If you want to browse other topics, you can also check our Table of Contents. The most current posts can always be found on our Front Page.
Our sponsors help us stay online to serve you. Thank you for doing your part! By using the specific links below (clicking through from our site) to start any of your online shopping, you are making a tremendous difference. By using the shopping links provided on a Kansas Free Press page, you are directly helping to support the Kansas Free Press:

