« Previous Story | Front Page | Next Story »

Against Injustice: Doris Gent (Ravenfeather)

By Vickie Stangl
News | August 10, 2012

WICHITA, Kan. - On August 3rd, 2012 in Municipal Court in Wichita, the case against grandmother and citizen activist Doris Lynn Crouse Gent (Ravenfeather) on a charge of obstruction of justice, was finally adjudicated.

As Doris attempted to leave the Drury Hotel with other activists on November 16th after protesting Governor Brownback's Town Hall Meeting on childhood poverty, Doris allegedly grabbed and/or pulled the arm of a police officer who was holding another activist. City police arrested her on a charge of obstructing justice.

The activist at the center of this storm is Susan Schoket. Susan was stopped by Officer Creighton who physically held her arm as she attempted to walk out the door. Creighton said he did not know why he was asked to provide backup at the Drury Hotel nor did he know why he was asked to detain Susan. As Susan was being held, other activists were making their way to the door to leave.

Doris was one of those activists. She was accused of coming up and trying to interfere in Susan's situation by pulling her away from the officer. During the trial, Susan adamantly testified that Doris never touched the police officer in any way, nor grabbed Susan's arm to pull her away from the officer. Susan did admit that she and Doris were loud in telling the office they had done nothing wrong and were leaving.

As Creighton was holding Susan's arm, and Doris was speaking to Officer Creighton, Officer Wright came up quickly from behind, grabbed Doris and slammed her into a pillar. As readers recall from an earlier story posted, Doris ended up going to Wesley Hospital where she was treated for a sprained neck.

An infamous photo shows the officer cuffing Doris even as she was dazed and confused about why the officer was grabbing her and trying to pick up her coat and purse that had fallen to the ground. During the trial, the prosecutor claimed she was resisting arrest-which was a new allegation that Doris must have been surprised to hear. If she were resisting arrest, why was she not charged for this as well?

As for Susan Schoket, obviously the judge did not believe her testimony was credible - or in layman's terms - he thought she was lying. With the conclusion of the defense witnesses, the judge quickly ruled in favor of Officer Wright who maintained that as he came up behind Doris with his 6'7" 200 lb towering frame to arrest the 5'1 grandmother, he was just doing his job to stop Doris from interfering with the other officer's actions. Of course, when the defense asked Officer Wright if he felt threatened, or if the other officer had felt threatened or had asked Wright for help, he said simply, "No."

It begs the question: "Why did the officer interfere and interfere with such force?" Several other questions were never answered in this trial. Who called the police to the hotel in the first place? Who called for back-up and why? In essence, who relayed to the police force that this peaceful protest was to be quashed?

Any reasonable observer would have to conclude that in this case, the police officer in question clearly overreacted and used poor judgment. To protect his actions, he came up with the convenient and phony charge of obstruction of justice to hide his rash behavior.

The judge did not see it that way. Judge Abbott quickly and without much regard for the testimony from defense witnesses in support of Ms. Gent, fined the defendant $50 dollars on a charge of obstruction of justice.

The judge announced it necessary to provide a civics lesson to the defense attorney for daring to compare Doris' actions to Dr. Martin Luther King who said, "Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about the things that matter." Defense attorney Jon McConnell passionately argued that Doris was following in the long tradition of other Americans who speak out against injustice but instead, was brutally arrested and assaulted for no credible reason.

The judge used the power of his bench to demean the defense's plea with the most alarming statement of the entire two hour trial. Judge Abbott said that Gandhi and Dr. Martin Luther King always understood they were breaking the law and could be arrested. Therefore the judge implied that Doris must have understood she could not just protest and expect to walk out the doors of the Drury Hotel and skip home free as a member of Occupy Wichita. In other words, civil disobedience has its consequences.

This was news to Doris. She was not purposely or knowingly trying to create an act of civil disobedience in the likes of King and Gandhi but simply exercising her freedom of speech. She simply wished to protest a public policy without having any intentions of breaking any laws.

In essence, the judge ruled that Doris should have assumed she could be arrested in America, just like in any totalitarian state for speaking out, and that was her mistake for not understanding this fact.

The irony of the judge's remark is that Doris was not even a member of Occupy Wichita and didn't even know the other protesters very well. She related to me that she didn't know there was to be a statement read in unison or fliers handed out.

She had simply attended the Town Hall meeting to see what kind of information the Heritage Foundation planned to discuss. When others began to stand at the end of the speaker's presentation with their backs to the speaker in silent protest, she made a fateful decision to stand in solidarity with this action. She never dreamed that after walking peacefully out of the meeting and planning to leave the hotel, her life was about to be turned upside down both figuratively and literally by Officer Wright's poor judgment.

The dangerous and faulty logic of Judge Abbott was certainly repugnant. Abbott could have reminded the officers in question that their first duty was to keep the peace and protect the public - not slam citizens into walls just because a few activists raised their voices. It was clear the judge did not want to hold Officer Wright accountable for his poor judgment. The judge did not wish to make the city vulnerable to a lawsuit by admitting the police used unnecessary force against Doris.

With Abbott's decision, the city of Wichita can collect it's money, the officers involved are exonerated and the Occupy Wichita people should be on high alert that exercising their constitutional right to peacefully assemble will get them arrested on whatever charge the police department can concoct.

Liberal citizens of Wichita should take heed. If you plan to protest and peacefully assemble, you run the risk of getting arrested. This may come as a surprise to most Americans who believe it is their constitutional right to stand up for something they believe in and be free from arrest if they have not harmed anyone or destroyed property.

There is a double standard in Wichita when it comes to the treatment of liberal versus conservative protesters. Tea Party, gun-toting, anti-abortion protesters have been viewed as noble crusaders here in Wichita. Anti-abortion protesters were protected for years by sympathetic WIchita officials and police. Operation Rescue was allowed to ignored the FACE Act and routinely demonized Dr.Tiller. They surrounded his clinic, harassed his patients, harassed his staff and of course, stalked Dr.Tiller in his own home and church. Yes, for years the "truth truck" appeared all over Wichita in the name of free speech spreading a message of hate against Dr.Tiller. But goodness, those upstanding, moral public officials were just so sorry when an anti-abortion protester entered Dr.Tiller's church and assassinated him.

Ultimately, Judge Abbott ruled that City Hall would not abide by the socialist rabble of Occupy Wichita who dared to challenge the status quo and make officials within the Brownback Administration look ridiculous.

Doris never had a chance in Municipal Court . Thanks to her tenacity and determined spirit, Doris showed she would not be bullied into silence and demanded her day in court against her accusers. She stood up against injustice and in today's mad world, it is a victory she can cherish.


Vickie, are you sure that little old 5'1" grandmother didn't kick that little officer in the shins? I'm sure both officers were most likely carrying their service revolvers and just wanted to get the upper hand, before things got out of control !!!

The ultra conservative right folks are always fearful of a police state. Maybe those two women needed to have 'carry permits' and pulled their weapons to protect themselves from what appears to be over reaction of law enforcement officers.

Do we have any eye witnesses to this that can testify that the officer had reason to slam a little old lady into a pillar, with such force as to cause her bodily harm, and then cuff her to prevent any further violent behaviour from her? Were those ladies disturbing the peace and quiet of the neighborhood with their loud protests? Were they using profane language and demeaning slurs? (Limbaugh comes to mind, but he gots praises from the 'right' for his public protest.)

I don't know all the details of this particular case. But, is this an 'activist' judge warning all those in his jurisdiction to not question or protest political social issues? Just keep your mouth shut and squat if the police officer says squat.

Abortion clinic protestors certainly interfered with the freedom of individuals to manage their own affairs and choose their own course of action. Property damage and even some physical violence didn't bring the police in to make immediate arrests. The cost to the taxpayers for police protection of both sides in those battles was tremendous.

It seems to me we have a significant number of people interested in protecting freedom of speech and protection of property, only if it's their speech or their property.

Ken--There were plenty of eyewitnesses to what happened and there is also a video that is quite disturbing to watch. I wasn't there, but the video was enough to convince me that the police officer overreacted.

Vickie--Thanks for the account of the trial. Having demonstrated on the street for years, I'm well aware that the police treat liberals differently than they treat conservatives. Several years ago, some demonstrators from the Peace Center stood at the corner of 21st and Rock Road with our signs protesting the invasion of Iraq. Someone called the cops on us. When they got there, a woman officer told us we couldn't be there.

As you know, I had done plenty of clinic support, so I knew the rules of demonstating pretty well. I argued with her and pointed out to her that the protestors at George Tiller's clinic stood in the middle of Kellogg with the signs and no one stopped them. She then told us we had to keep walking, which we did, then she left. John McConnell, a retired navy lieutenant, was the Peace Center director at the time, and was standing next to me. He told me later he was afraid I was going to get us both arrested. There were no grounds to arrest us, but I suppose the officer could have made up grounds.

The judge in Doris's case was screwed in the head. The best response to this decision is to keep demonstrating. I say that knowing I don't go out on the street any longer. I have a terrible time walking and I'm not near as strong as I once was. If some cop decided to manhandle me, I would be in a world of hurt. Thanks to you for writing this and getting the story out. I hope you share it on Facebook.


Diane you are so correct. And, yes there were plenty of witnesses although most did not see the confrontation the officers concocted and the one witness, who was in the center of it all and clearly told the Judge that Doris did not touch the officer or grab anyone's arm-was simply ignored!

I too have seen the anti-abortion protesters treated with kid gloves but god forbid a liberal should protest and it is the end of the world!

Ken the thought of those two women being armed is something I never thought of but the outcome would have been tragic. I'm sure the officers would have fired first and asked questions later.

Just another great example of how NO ONE-including our own officers should be armed. People are not responsible with their guns and how can the police know who is the good citizen v. the bad citizen when they see a gun pulled?

And you are so correct about the Summer of Mercy and the toll it took on the city and taxpayers of Wichita. But,as I stated, city officials like certain council members,the mayor,the city attorney, were all in bed with the protesters and allowed the thing to escalate to the point that they were not only violating the law but endangering the public.

The point we should all be concerned with is that the public is always considered in the wrong when it comes to city officials and their actions which is rather like any totalitarian state. Just because you get your day in court, does not mean justice will be served. There is something truly disturbing about that fact in America. The number of people arrested, serving jail time or sentenced for something they did not do is frightening. I think that is the true story of Doris Gent-innocent people are continually marginalized and swept under the carpet for the misdeeds of the very people who are suppose to protect the citizens from harm-not shut them up and shut them down for their political viewpoint. Anti-abortion protesters had every right to protest but they continually broke the law, harassed patients,staff and Dr. Tiller and the city DID NOTHING to stop their brazen campaign to smear and frighten anyone who gave any support to Dr. Tiller in this community-not to mention the hatred they fanned against Dr. Tiller. It was just plain wrong.

I had guessed that there were witnesses to the event. Had there been more evidence of the women being physically abusive, the judge would have most likely did a little more than a token fine of $50.00. I wonder about the strategy and competence of the defense lawyer. The court room, in this case should be about freedom of speech and protection from bodily harm, not ideology or theology. It should have made no difference whether these women were advocating tax cuts for the wealthy or cash vouchers for the poor.

Isn't it ironic that both the liberals and the conservatives accuse the other of being totalitarian.

The conservatives, in general, want less government and less interference from government regulations and enforcement. But, they are quick to support harsh judgment and quick punishment for anyone that dares question their program with speech or demonstration. If government promotes and enforces their theology and ethics, it cannot be too big or powerful.

The liberals, in general, want less government interference in their personal relationships, but welcome government enforcement of freedom of choice and equal treatment for all.

We have extremists and radicals in both camps. What we need is for more moderates to speak up and work for unity in society. There is a little bit of good in all of us and plenty of bad in all of us. Why don’t we attempt to accentuate the positive and eliminate the negative.

Post your own comment here

Do you want to read more? You've only just scratched the surface at the Kansas Free Press. We have so much more to read! Nearly all of the pieces published here are timeless and relevant, regardless of when the articles were first published. To discover more, please take a look at our Table of Contents or go back to our Front Page.

Our sponsors help us stay online to serve you. Thank you for doing your part! By using the specific links below (clicking through from our site) to start any of your online shopping, you are making a tremendous difference. By using the shopping links provided on a Kansas Free Press page, you are directly helping to support the Kansas Free Press:

About This Page

This page contains just one story published on August 10, 2012. The one written previous to this is titled "Red Ink: Getting the Facts Straight" and the story published right after this one is "To Vote or Not To Vote"

Our most current stories are always updated on our Front Page.

Other Archives

Interested in other topics? You may wish to poke around in our Table of Contents to find other sections and archives.

Do you want to explore pieces written by specific authors? You can find archives for KFP writers by reviewing our complete Directory of Authors and Writers here.

Recently Featured Stories

My Response As a Kansan to Jessica Valenti

Jessica Valenti has come on board The Nation magazine to fill in for Katha Pollitt as the feminist columnist while Pollitt is on leave to write a book. I've found reading Valenti's columns thought-provoking and insightful. She often takes …
Of Angels and God's Dogs

There might be a whole group of us out there--people who value our relationships with animals on a par with our ties to people. "Get over it--it was just a dog" does not resonate with us. Our society places …
Of Angels and God's Dogs

There might be a whole group of us out there--people who value our relationships with animals on a par with our ties to people. "Get over it--it was just a dog" does not resonate with us. Our society places …
Roots of the n-word

While N-word dialogue has slackened following Saline County Commissioner Gile's use of it recently, the word still has great power. So, let's look inward at the N-word. To reach a much deeper path to understanding, simply go to Ad …
Corporate Tax Reform

Basehor, Kans.--For an interesting twist on the corporate tax debate, look at Alan Sloan's opinion in the April 29 issue of Fortune Magazine. In all of the froth about corporate taxation, neither proponents of tax reduction, nor corporate critics, …

News and Opinion

Get Connected

See our FB page!
Subscribe for free!
[Feeds & Readers...]
Follow Kansas Free Press on Twitter, too!
Make Kansas Free Press your home page!

Journalists, sign in.

We're reader supported!

Whenever you use the specific links below to begin any of your online shopping, a portion of your sale goes directly towards the support of this site.

Tech Depot - An Office Depot Co.

Our sponsors help us stay online to serve you. Thank you for doing your part! By using the specific links above (clicking through from our site) to start any of your online shopping, you are making a tremendous difference. By using the shopping links provided on a Kansas Free Press page, you are directly helping to support the Kansas Free Press.

Thank you for your help!

Notices & Policies

All of our Kansas Free Press journalists are delighted that you are here. We all hope that you come here often, sign in and leave us comments, and become an active part of our community. Welcome!

Our writers are credentialed after referral to, and approval by, the editor/publisher of KansasFreePress.com. If you are interested in writing with us, please feel free to let us know here. We are always looking for Kansans who want to write about Kansas!

All authors here retain their own copyrights for their original written works, original photographs and art works. They welcome others to copy, reference or quote from the content of their stories, provided that the reprints include obvious author and website attribution and links to the original page, in accordance with this publication's Creative Commons License.

Our editor primarily reviews stories for spelling, grammar, punctuation and formatting and is not liable or responsible for the opinions expressed by individual authors. The opinions and accuracy of information in the individual stories on this site are the sole responsibility of each of the individual authors. For complete site policies, including privacy, see our Frequently Asked Questions. This site is designed, maintained, and owned by its publisher, Everyday Citizen Media. The Kansas Free Press, KansasFreePress.com, and Kansas Free Press are trademarked names.

© Copyright, 2008-2012, all rights reserved, unless otherwise specified, first by the respective author, and then by KFP's publisher and owner for any otherwise unreserved and all other content.