« Previous Story | Front Page | Next Story »

Religious Mischief Behind All-faith Chapel

By Vickie Stangl
Analysis | February 28, 2012

kansas-state-capitol-1.jpgTOPEKA, Kan. - Conservatives in the Kansas legislature are once again up to their old tricks of trying to turn the Capitol into a religious body. A new proposal was announced this week that would provide Kansas state lawmakers with a very special privilege; an "All-faiths" chapel inside the Capitol building. There are many legal concerns as well as practical arguments against the All-faiths chapel. However, the important question to raise is why such a proposal has suddenly appeared?

The whole effort is nothing more than religious mischief concocted by the religious right. If the proposal goes nowhere in this session, the idea still gets out in front of the public to build momentum and support down the road for a chapel. Make no mistake that behind this audacious proposal, the All-faiths chapel is a very calculated and concrete challenge to elevate religion in Kansas government and devalue secularism. This proposal essentially demands that Kansas government accommodate and provide for religion to establish a real presence within the Statehouse and serve as a visible reminder that faith is paramount in governing when in fact, governing should be neutral when it comes to religious promotion. Establishing a chapel in the Capitol building is hardly a neutral act.

Providing a house of worship within the Capitol sends the message that religion is a unique institution to be given a special space and status in the very building that all Kansas taxpayers support regardless of their faith or beliefs. Of course, this proposal does not make provisions for other groups to enjoy the same privilege of setting up shop within the Capitol to promote their beliefs or their philosophy. Imagine a proposal that would allow Americans United for the Separation of Church and State to have a permanent room under the dome to educate lawmakers that they must be guardians in upholding the separation of church-state principle. Right, not bloody likely.

The All-faith chapel proposal may also be a campaign strategy by conservative republicans hoping to weed out moderates who don't support God, babies and apple pie. Democrats who oppose such a bill could also be labeled as godless. Opposing a chapel could put the voters in such a tizzy that it might take the heat off Laffer's Voodoo economics and divert attention away from the conservatives attempts to rob the poor in the state while stripping funding for public education to insert vouchers into the plan for religious schools. Religion is such a handy tool to divide the people and instill anger. Let's face it, stirring up believers provides far more political bang for the buck than stirring up anti-abortion forces over contraceptives.

There are numerous reasons to oppose the All-faiths chapel proposal as a misguided effort . Those arguments are listed as follows:

1. The chapel is simply unnecessary. As noted by other public officials, there are ample houses of worship in close proximity to the Capitol.

2. Legislators can pray any day, at anytime, including in their own offices.

3. Even if private funds were raised to build some kind of chapel-it is nevertheless on government property. Not only are we talking prime real estate in the heart of the Capitol but using government property for religious purposes instead of the people's business is just wrong.

4. As already noted, the Capitol has very limited space available with little to spare. Is it really a good use of space to provide for a chapel when religious bodies surround the Capitol?

5. Constitutionally it is a bad idea. While the constitution states "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion" this new proposal would do just that-establish the ability for religion to operate on government property. [Remember, under the 14th Amendment, the 1st Amendment was made applicable to the states thus through this select incorporation of the Bill or Rights through the 14th Amendment by the Supreme Court, the 1st amendment protections apply to the states therefore, states cannot make laws respecting an establishment of religion.] It could be argued the legislature's move to set up a chapel, even with private funds, is still on government property and thus promotes and/or sets up religion by the state.

I can hear the arguments now. "But Congress has a prayer room and has even held services in the Capitol!" While historically religious services were held in the U.S. House of Representatives as early as 1800, this occurred due to fact there were few church structures in the capitol. Jefferson even attended some of these services to quiet his enemies who believed he was a heretic.

Just because services took place in the federal capitol building does not mean this action was constitutional. It instead, illustrates how the tyranny of the majority has often had the power to disregard the Constitution. Since the majority in America at this time was Christian and there were no constitutional objections, political leaders had very little pressure to respect the church-state principle since they viewed it as a heretical idea. Today, the religious right points to these historical events as some kind of legal precedent to allow chaplains, invocations, and now a chapel within our government bodies. What our history simply reflects is the willfulness of early Christian political leaders and their refusal to uphold and respect the 1st Amendment's establishment clause because they could.

In the U.S. Capitol there is a congressional prayer room established in 1954. Keep in mind 1954 was a watershed year when Christian clergy and Christian politicians actively promoted their faith as superior to all others, especially in comparison to the godless communists of the Soviet Union. These men quite literally ignored the Constitution and pushed their dogma into the government arena without much opposition. It was a time when being Jewish or Atheist was tantamount to being a traitor. Not only did the republicans push for a prayer room, but the pledge of allegiance was altered to force all Americans to affirm God. And, let's not forget how Congress shamelessly altered our national motto from E Pluribus Unum to "In God We Trust".

Designating space for a chapel within the heart of our lawmaking body is recognition that government is giving faith a special nod and this is an inherently dangerous proposition. No one is denying legislators the right to pray- but they must do it on their own time and not expect the government to provide the privilege of space and facilities unless the very same privilege is afforded to ALL other philosophies such as Humanists and Atheists. Sharing the chapel space would not be acceptable to nonfaith groups since they are not a religion therefore, separate space must be made available for freethinkers if the faithful are going to enjoy the privilege of government sanctioned space for their use.

In short, the proposal is nothing but mischief, mischief, mischief and Kansans should be spared such infantile intrigue especially during such perilous economic times.


What a wonderful idea! Now let's see — have we decided how we'll furnish this Chapel? Will we have a communion table, an altar, a lecturn for accepted and approved scripture reading, and a lecturn for the chaplain's words of inspiration, admonition and judgment? Will we have cushioned pews, straight backed benches, kneeling boards? Will we have statues honoring the different Saints, the Crucifix or an empty cross? Will we display an open Bible and which version or translation will it be? All these decisions and choices will have to be made to accomodate just the Christian faiths.

Now, what statues, pictures, plaques and paraphrenalia will we furnish for all the non-christian faiths? 'All Faiths' is a pretty diverse and open invitation.

Will we have a crew available to clean out any scents left behind by the 'peyote' smokers or incense burning groups. How about a careful inspection to guarantee the next group doesn't encounter any snakes left behind by a group that uses such reptiles in their worship rituals?

Vickie, I'm sure the ones promoting this All Faiths Chapel have no intention of it being used by anyone that doesn't abide by their narrow definition of 'true faith'. No Islamic, Evangelical Gay, Moon Worshiping, Christian Scientist, Unitarian, etc. groups need apply.

How will we handle reservations for all faith groups that wish to take advantage of the accomodations?

Ken, excellent points! I have this image of people hitting each other over the heads with candle sticks and hymnals in defense of their space. Your many hilarious descriptions of tyring to "accommodate" all reveals one more reason how this could be a nightmare and is just a dumb, dumb, idea.

Religious mischief? Wow, now that’s an original. I’ll have to write that colossal jewel of ignorance down for future reference. Ya know Ms. Vickie; I think I may have misread you. It’s not that you’re a Catholic hater; it’s that you just plain despise religion – period. Piece a work.

Catholic hater? Wow, didn't know I wrote that any where. Yes, I am passionate against people who use their religion to harm others. Period.

Jonathan, do you wear the traditional long white curly wig that the wise old majistrates of the English courts wear? Those wigs are designed to give the appearance of wisdom attained with age and experience. I've got both age and experience, but I'm not sure it guarantees wisdom concerning all matters. Obviously, you don't either (in my case).

Why don't you argue your assessments and opinions on their merits, instead of attacking the intelligence of others? It certainly does not prove your intelligence by declaring the ignorance of others.

Vickie, I, too, am passionate against people who use their religion to harm others. Period.

Jonathan, I profess to be Christian, and I'll trust God to judge my profession and practices. You, also profess to be Christian. I don't agree with all the tenates of your Roman Catholic doctrine, but I stop far short of declaring you ignorant for your beliefs and support of your doctrines of faith. I will plea my case before God and trust that He will forgive me if I'm wrong. I'll also trust God to forgive you if you are wrong. Now, that takes care of our life in the hereafter. It is up to us and the rest of the world's society to work out our differences, so we can survive together in the here and now. Calling one another ignorant (jewel of ignorance) ain't a gonna work out those differences.

Post your own comment here

Do you want to read more? You've only just scratched the surface at the Kansas Free Press. We have so much more to read! Nearly all of the pieces published here are timeless and relevant, regardless of when the articles were first published. To discover more, please take a look at our Table of Contents or go back to our Front Page.

Our sponsors help us stay online to serve you. Thank you for doing your part! By using the specific links below (clicking through from our site) to start any of your online shopping, you are making a tremendous difference. By using the shopping links provided on a Kansas Free Press page, you are directly helping to support the Kansas Free Press:

About This Page

This page contains just one story published on February 28, 2012. The one written previous to this is titled "Pull Your Bottom Lip Over Your Head" and the story published right after this one is "Egg Him"

Our most current stories are always updated on our Front Page.

Other Archives

Interested in other topics? You may wish to poke around in our Table of Contents to find other sections and archives.

Do you want to explore pieces written by specific authors? You can find archives for KFP writers by reviewing our complete Directory of Authors and Writers here.

Recently Featured Stories

My Response As a Kansan to Jessica Valenti

Jessica Valenti has come on board The Nation magazine to fill in for Katha Pollitt as the feminist columnist while Pollitt is on leave to write a book. I've found reading Valenti's columns thought-provoking and insightful. She often takes …
Of Angels and God's Dogs

There might be a whole group of us out there--people who value our relationships with animals on a par with our ties to people. "Get over it--it was just a dog" does not resonate with us. Our society places …
Of Angels and God's Dogs

There might be a whole group of us out there--people who value our relationships with animals on a par with our ties to people. "Get over it--it was just a dog" does not resonate with us. Our society places …
Roots of the n-word

While N-word dialogue has slackened following Saline County Commissioner Gile's use of it recently, the word still has great power. So, let's look inward at the N-word. To reach a much deeper path to understanding, simply go to Ad …
Corporate Tax Reform

Basehor, Kans.--For an interesting twist on the corporate tax debate, look at Alan Sloan's opinion in the April 29 issue of Fortune Magazine. In all of the froth about corporate taxation, neither proponents of tax reduction, nor corporate critics, …

News and Opinion

Get Connected

See our FB page!
Subscribe for free!
[Feeds & Readers...]
Follow Kansas Free Press on Twitter, too!
Make Kansas Free Press your home page!

Journalists, sign in.

We're reader supported!

Whenever you use the specific links below to begin any of your online shopping, a portion of your sale goes directly towards the support of this site.

Tech Depot - An Office Depot Co.

Our sponsors help us stay online to serve you. Thank you for doing your part! By using the specific links above (clicking through from our site) to start any of your online shopping, you are making a tremendous difference. By using the shopping links provided on a Kansas Free Press page, you are directly helping to support the Kansas Free Press.

Thank you for your help!

Notices & Policies

All of our Kansas Free Press journalists are delighted that you are here. We all hope that you come here often, sign in and leave us comments, and become an active part of our community. Welcome!

Our writers are credentialed after referral to, and approval by, the editor/publisher of KansasFreePress.com. If you are interested in writing with us, please feel free to let us know here. We are always looking for Kansans who want to write about Kansas!

All authors here retain their own copyrights for their original written works, original photographs and art works. They welcome others to copy, reference or quote from the content of their stories, provided that the reprints include obvious author and website attribution and links to the original page, in accordance with this publication's Creative Commons License.

Our editor primarily reviews stories for spelling, grammar, punctuation and formatting and is not liable or responsible for the opinions expressed by individual authors. The opinions and accuracy of information in the individual stories on this site are the sole responsibility of each of the individual authors. For complete site policies, including privacy, see our Frequently Asked Questions. This site is designed, maintained, and owned by its publisher, Everyday Citizen Media. The Kansas Free Press, KansasFreePress.com, and Kansas Free Press are trademarked names.

© Copyright, 2008-2012, all rights reserved, unless otherwise specified, first by the respective author, and then by KFP's publisher and owner for any otherwise unreserved and all other content.