WICHITA, Kan. - Sen. Sam Brownback will take on the title of Gov. Sam Brownback in January when he becomes the new governor of Kansas. He joins ninety-two Republicans, many of them replacing liberal Democrats or moderate Republicans, in the Kansas Legislature as the Kansas manifestation of the massive right-wing takeover of America that occurred in the Nov. 2, 2010, election. Many liberals have already bemoaned this rightward shift in the Kansas political landscape, which except for the short-lived two-L Phill Kline aberration in the early 2000s, has tended to fit into the moderate to liberal spectrum.
People laud Brownback for his stand against human trafficking around the world and against genocide in Darfur. Who can argue with Brownback's stand on these issues, stands that certainly have relevance in foreign countries? What about his stands on human rights in America? Let's just say unless you're a zygote that might be useful in stem cell research or a fetus that is causing grief for the woman that is carrying it, fuggedabuotit, as they say in Soprano-land. For you see, in SamBrownbackWorld, the only good woman is the woman who has her babies for the sake of the country, specifically to keep Social Security out of deficit territory.
Recently, I ran across an AP article from April 12, 1999, about Brownback's speech at Butler Community College. The article quoted him on his theory that the problem with Social Security is that women have had too many abortions. According to Brownback, if only those pesky women had given birth to those unwanted children, Social Security would be in good shape. His reasoning? Since the 1973 Supreme Court Roe v. Wade decision, women have given birth to too few worker bees. Given those abortions, it's impossible to keep Social Security afloat for all the Baby Boomers who are now retiring. Strangely, he didn't say that the parents of the Baby Boomers should have backed off from having all those kids that someone else would have to support when they retired.
The article, carried in the Topeka Capital-Journal, quoted Brownback, " 'A lot of people won't like this comment,' the Kansas Republican said Friday to an audience of high school and college students at Butler County Community College. 'You can see a real impact in the abortion policy we've had in this country. We have a lot fewer people out here. You can see we have a lot fewer workers coming on board.' "
He then urged the high school students in the audience to have many children. "You need to think about having five or six more children in the family, instead of two or three," he said, as he smiled at the young people who looked decidedly uncomfortable.
Also in the audience were adults, including several senior citizens. I was there that day, forgoing an interesting lunchtime conversation with my English instructor colleagues to to listen to Brownback's speech.
I have been an abortion rights advocate for years. I've done clinic support, attended workshops, lobbied legislators, and participated in media interviews about abortion rights, so I have a pretty good handle on all the arguments anti-choice advocates use against legal abortion and how to answer them. However, this was a new one on me and I was in shock that Brownback, a U.S. Senator who should have known why the Social Security system was in trouble, would publicly blame women for this problem. I was even more shocked that he would urge high school students, too young to be parents, to have lots of children.
Of course, I knew Brownback was anti-choice, a stance he took as it became politically expedient to do so. He even left the Methodist Church, moderate on abortion rights, to become a Roman Catholic. But who would ever expect him to blame women for a problem caused by the very government in which he was a major player? The Social Security deficit, from everything I can find out in my research, is in trouble because the government has thrown Social Security proceeds into the general U.S. treasury, a move that has drained money for retirees' benefits. Granted this is an over-simplified explanation for the problems with Social Security, but that's a topic for another day.
So, I walked to the middle of the lecture hall, an empty space where Brownback couldn't miss seeing me and I said this: "I don't think women should have on their backs fixing the economy of this country by having more children."
I also told him that he shouldn't blame women having abortions for the shortcomings in the Social Security system.
He responded by saying he wasn't blaming women. Well, who else was he blaming? Men don't have abortions. In most cases except the most tragic, children don't have abortions. So who's left to blame in SamBrownbackWorld?
After I made my comments, I had to leave to teach a class, so no reporters talked to me after the speech. I was identified in the AP article as an "older woman in the audience." That's okay. I was older. I also felt that I represented every woman who had come of age during a time when the only way they could control their reproduction was by finding doctors or lay people who had mastered the techniques of performing abortions, albeit illegally. Of course, every woman who ever sought to have such an abortion took a chance that the procedure would leave her injured or dead. The fact is, though, a woman who doesn't want to carry a pregnancy to term will do anything to end it.
The reporter noted that Brownback avoided his charge against women during the rest of his speaking tour, even though in a later speech he " 'joked with Chamber of Commerce members that some had done their part by having children -- and that more needed to get started.' "
While the German phrase. Kinder, Küche, Kirche originated with German Emperor Wilhelm II, Adolf Hitler also encouraged German women of Aryan descent to stay at home and have children, the "good little Nazis" who would spread Germany's, and Hitler's, power throughout the world. Hitler implemented a Law for the Encouragement of Marriage, and in a 1934 speech, Hitler argued that a German woman's worth should be defined by her husband, her family, her children, and her home. Also he awarded women with four or more children with the Cross of Honor of the German Mother.
Brownback is not Hitler. But his emphasis on a woman's role being chiefly defined as childbearing for the good of the state is creepy. I do know based on his record he will do everything in his power to end a woman's legal right to have an abortion. He will also try to end state funding to Planned Parenthood, the one institution that has as its goal helping women avoid unwanted pregnancies. With the Kansas State Legislature now on board to support him and with Troy Newman, Operation Rescue head, and Mary Kay Culp, executive director of Kansans for Life, likely working right now on abortion restriction bills to introduce in the 2011 session, women's control over their lives is on the line.
So, even though right-wing Republicans, particularly those of the Teabagger stripe, have promised to get government out of our lives, Kansas women should know that government will be in their lives in ways that they've never before experienced. Don't worry, though. Those who find themselves forced to give birth to children they don't want, can't support, and are unable to care for should stand up and salute. They're doing it for America and for their retired parents and grandparents.














Well done, Diane.
Brownback may not be a Hitler. But, given his affiliation with The Family and their seeming approval of that kind of fanaticism, his brand of "patriotism" smacks of theocracy.
We don't need a Christian Taliban in the U.S.
Thaks, Will. Those of us in favor of abortion rights have our work cut out for us.
Great article, Diane! I wish everyone in the state would read it. For Kansas, and particularly for Kansas women, November 2 is a "day that will live in infamy."
Thanks, Ethel. Unfortunately, it's too late now to do anything about it.
No, no, no — Diane, it is never too late. Continue to talk or write to the political leaders, talk at the coffee shop, write to the editor, etc. etc.
Theocracy has its place in your church or religious groups. But, theocracy has no place in government. Theocracy has a place of influence in our personal lives and through that we should reflect our morals and ethics to others, whether in or out of government. Our constitution DOES NOT declare we are a Christian nation nor does it indicate anywhere that the Judeo/Christian Bible is the blue print for all our laws. In fact it explicitly prohibits government involvement or support of any religious doctrines or practices. And it explicitly says that no religious entity should be allowed to demand government support for their programs.
Ken--I meant it's to late to unelect Brownback. It's definitely not too late to fight his policies. Maybe his policies will serve as a wake-up call to reasonable people. I think that's what happened when Phill Kline became attorney general.
I am a constant letter writer. I also talk to people about the state of politics today. Some of most fruitful discussions take place in water aerobics class, if you can believe it. People see my letters to the editor and that leads to conversations.