HAYS, Kan. - Researchers have now found that the destruction of old bone during normal skeletal regrowth - a process known as resorption - is necessary to maintain a healthy level of glucose in the blood. We now know that the skeleton plays an important role in regulating blood sugar. The finding, published in Cell, is important because it may lead to a greater understanding of how to treat both diabetes type 2 as well as osteoporosis.
This study has further illuminated how bone controls this process.
While resorption is a process that occurs throughout life to make way for new bone, researchers discovered that it also acts to stimulate the release of insulin into the bloodstream and improve the uptake of glucose by cells in the entire body. The findings suggest that, for some people, diabetes may develop from changes in the skeleton.
Insulin signaling in bone favors whole-body glucose homeostasis by activating osteocalcin. (1) Insulin signals osteoblasts, bone cells responsible for bone formation, which (2) tell osteoclasts, bone cells responsible for resorption, to destroy old bone. Next (3), the acidic (low pH) conditions created by the osteoclasts activates osteocalcin inside the bone. Finally (4), the active osteocalcin released from bone travels to the pancreas and stimulates the release of more insulin.
While resorption is a process that occurs throughout life to make way for new bone, findings suggest that, for some people, diabetes may develop from changes in the skeleton, and that drugs designed to stimulate the bone-insulin pathway may lead to better drugs for type 2 diabetes.
Led by Gerard Karsenty, MD, PhD, chair of the Department of Genetics and Development at Columbia University Medical Center, Dr. Karsenty's team discovered that it also acts to stimulate the release of insulin into the bloodstream and improve the uptake of glucose by cells in the entire body.
The first clue that the skeleton may have an important role in regulating blood glucose came in 2007 when Dr. Karsenty discovered that a hormone released by bone - known as osteocalcin - can regulate glucose levels. Osteocalcin turns on the production of insulin in the pancreas and improves the ability of other cells to take in glucose. Both of these processes are impaired in type 2 diabetes.
The new paper reveals that osteocalcin cannot work until cells that degrade bone start working and begin the resorption process. As the cells degrade bone, inactive osteocalcin is converted to its active form by the increase in acidity around the bone.
"Remarkably, insulin was discovered to favor bone resorption. Hence, in a feed-forward loop it favors the activation of osteocalcin, which in turn favors insulin synthesis and secretion," said Dr. Karsenty. "Insulin is a street-smart molecule that takes advantage of the functional interplay between bone resorption and osteocalcin, to turn-on the secretion and synthesis of more insulin."
By identifying the tight connection existing between energy metabolism and skeleton physiology - in this case between insulin and osteocalcin - this new study further underscores the wealth of physiological function exerted by the skeleton. The finding further strengthens the idea that diabetes could be treated by increasing the level of osteocalcin in the body. In addition, the researchers suggested that since most drugs to treat another condition - osteoporosis - work by inhibiting bone resorption, the drugs may decrease the activation of osteocalcin and cause glucose intolerance in some patients.
"This research has important implications for both diabetes and osteoporosis patients," said Dr. Karsenty. "First, this research shows that osteocalcin is involved in diabetes onset; secondly, bone may become a new target in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, the most frequent form of diabetes, as it appears to contribute strongly to glucose intolerance; and, finally, osteocalcin could become a treatment for type 2 diabetes."
"And for people with osteoporosis, the concern is that a common treatment, bisphosphonates - which work by inhibiting bone resorption and therefore may increase glucose intolerance, could push someone with borderline glucose intolerance into full-fledged disease onset. Although, more research is needed to study this further," said Dr. Karsenty.














Thanks, Polly for your bloggs on health care and issues.
The insurance companies and, sometimes, the government programs seem to be headed in the direction of centralized specialist experts and big volume mail order pharmacies.
I want all my medical care run through my local family doctor and all my prescription meds through my local pharmacy. We have personal relationships and a mutual trust of one another. All my medical care should be funneled through them. Then we don't have a problem of two or three specialists performing conflicting procedures or prescribing medications that interfere with other meds. Relying on me to give accurate description of the current pain or malfuction, as it relates to my other problems is risky, to say the least. I don't know the names or drugs of all my meds, so why should they rely on me to tell them what I'm taking or not taking. My family doctor has a progressive record of my health issues and my local pharmacist know exactly what all my prescription meds are. They can, both, spot conflicts or irregularities long before I will.
Our health care system needs to stress the value of regular health care from a local doctor and support local availability and access to prescription pharmaceuticals.
There will come a time when my family doctor and local pharmacist will be a very critical needed part of my making decisions concerning health care that doesn't really enhance life but merely prolongs death. It is most unfortunate that we allowed the opposition to a national health care program to label the end of life consultants "Death Panels"!